[cardinalfire]

How do you guys feel this relates to Myers Briggs and what do you know about it?

The first time I got IEI - romantic (which I assume is INFP) then I got SEI which was the mediator type though I am unsure of its Myers Briggs equalivalent.

Anyway have a go here (Socionics Test) and then come back and lets discuss.

[Ben]

I got LIE, which I assume would be an ENTP.
I'm surprised they only take the time to ask three questions before generating your type.

[Grey]

I've taken this test before - I've received LII, which is the Socionics equivalent to INTJ. In the link of 'INTJ', there's a link to the Socionics wiki, which contains the descriptions for all of the types.

[skycloud86]

I got ILI, which sounds like an INTP. The test is a bit too short to get any fully accurate result though.

[firedell]

IEI - Intuitive Ethical Introtim
INFP. =/

[firedell]

The first time I got IEI - romantic (which I assume is INFP) then I got SEI which was the mediator type though I am unsure of its Myers Briggs equalivalent.

SEI It's ISFP. =]

[Aerorobyn]

I took it twice: Once with my own preferences - I got SEE "Politician" which is equivalent to ESFP, I believe.

Once with the preferences of a couple of family members - I got LSE "Director" for this one, which I believe is equivalent to ESTJ.

I personally do not like the test. None of the answers really suited me all that well - and the test is entirely too short, as Skycloud said, to give decent and accurate results.

[Liontiger]

I got IEI. Lulz. I'm not a fan of only having 3 questions to answer, nor did I really have a strong preference for any answer I chose.

[Clairière de Seigle]

LIE second and ILE first. It's whatever.

[cardinalfire]

I liked it because of what the questions asked more than the number of questions, though I did like that element because it meant that I wasn't mulling over the questions or working out what they mean. On some of these tests I don't always understand the wording of the question.