[Ms.Gymnast]

I don't like it when the "good" guy wins/when the "bad" guy loses. That is my main complaint. I have several more which I may post tomorrow.

Or at least they won because they were one of the good guys, even if they were a bumbling idiot. I was surprised (and saddened) by the ending of No Country for Old Men, but it *was* fitting.

[Souljorn]

over foreboding, sometimes I'll know a character will die just by the overall demeanor in which the author sets them up

[Niccolo Machiavelli]

Or at least they won because they were one of the good guys, even if they were a bumbling idiot. I was surprised (and saddened) by the ending of No Country for Old Men, but it *was* fitting.

Ever hear of a spoiler alert, fool?! You just ruined the ending of that movie for me!


But really, I don't know why so many people side with the so-called "Good Guys." Those guys suck!

[Ms.Gymnast]

Ever hear of a spoiler alert, fool?! You just ruined the ending of that movie for me!

Whoops. Duly noted.
But I didn't say *what* happened.

[Elwin]

@Niccolo Machiavelli Watch The Last American Virgin for a realistic ending.

[Niccolo Machiavelli]

Whoops. Duly noted.
But I didn't say *what* happened.

And yet it is still ruined for me. You will forever be known around these parts as "The Evil Girl Who Ruins Movies!"

@Niccolo Machiavelli Watch The Last American Virgin for a realistic ending.

I've never seen that one, but I've heard of it. If I do watch it, I'll keep that in mind.

[CeeJae_Flippert]

over foreboding, sometimes I'll know a character will die just by the overall demeanor in which the author sets them up

Ya I was watching topgun and i immediatly knew the best friend was going to die.

It drives me crazy when movies show people looking at things like a picture and the screen doesnt show us! It screws with my head!

[wiarumas]

I don't like unrealistic romances, glaring inconsistencies/inaccuracies, or overly dramatic garbage.

Did anyone else argue with the TV when they see previews for Limitless? "You can use 100% of your brain!" Its a widely debunked myth - we use 100% of our brains. I can let alot of stuff go (like the time machine in Terra Nova where people walk single file through it and come out single file on the other end), but I can't believe nobody fact checked that one and advertised it like that.

Sadly, still plan on seeing it one day because I heard it was half decent.

[kinetickyle]

I can't stand to see new character traits introduced simply for the sake of a plot line. For instance, there was an X-Files episode titled "First Person Shooter" that was genuinely awful. In that episode, it was heavily implied that the Lone Gunmen and Mulder were all gamers, but this was never mentioned before or after this crap episode. I require consistency in my television characters.

[kudi]

I'm not to nit picky with fiction in general, otherwise you'll die from the stress. It does need to be consistent and logical, else I get turned off. Stupid characters that are not funny are just plain annoying and so are to many lifeless stock characters.

I do have a bone to pick with romance story lines. The reconciliation part always kills me, its almost always something happens by chance and everything's happy again. And then there is that 2nd character they create that is meant to shake the main couple that you know stands no chance and its always apparent that he/she has no chance in hell. The female leads seem to always need the male lead to be complete them/raise em socially/economically/emotionally and yet the male is strong/smart/rich enough to not really need the female lead at all. Ok enough griping..