Um, does this make sense to you guys? o_O Why are the INTPs towards the bottom when I would say we're fairly interested in it? I could be misinterpreting...
Originally Posted by http://www.geocities.com/lifexplore/stats.htm
| | |
This is a discussion on Interest in typology within the Myers Briggs Forum forums, part of the Personality Type Forums category; Um, does this make sense to you guys? o_O Why are the INTPs towards the bottom when I would say ...

Um, does this make sense to you guys? o_O Why are the INTPs towards the bottom when I would say we're fairly interested in it? I could be misinterpreting...
Originally Posted by http://www.geocities.com/lifexplore/stats.htm
I think its basing it on how many intps have taken it which is 3%. Not sure!Weird since INTP's are one of the biggest groups on the internet.

Yeah, that's what I thought was weird too. Maybe I just get so used to seeing them all over the internet that I think they're omnipresent XD
This list seems wildly incorrect to me.
Ah but well, look at that rate there:
Only 14% of the takers were even NTs. Probably they had those tests hidden on some fluffy-buffy-bunny-page or something, so us NTs didn't even bother to ever check it.
Seriously, they should have invited 25% of each group. Would have been way more accurate. =3
I always liked these more, they seem far more accurate to me.
I could give a number of potential reasons I suspect the discrepancy occurred, but I'd still be forced to admit the results appear skewed differently than I would've imagined. Someone should conduct a survey into what attracted those SJs to researching MBTI.
Questors NP are 20%
Crazies SF are 30%
so if you expect the world to be rational ?
Not even the poltiicans are rational!
Managers NJ 29%
Projectors TP 10%
ENTP 2%
Maybe there are just less NT's in the world. Maybe INTP are online more is because they like systems and technology.
I have more theories. But they are just theories...
Ns, in general, comprise only about a third of the population. A great portion of NTs disregard MBTI and it's ilk as being little more than new age astrology, or question it's inherent validity based on a poorly written test and quickly decide they have better things to concern themselves with.
It would seem that there aren't many NTs beyond a certain age who develop an interest in typology, whereas SJs do so more frequently. . . often around the point of midlife crisis or as their Ne comes a bit more into its own.
Bookmarks