[INTJ] Who are the losers?

Who are the losers?

View Poll Results: Who are the losers?

Voters
17. You may not vote on this poll
  • ISFJ

    2 11.76%
  • ESFJ

    1 5.88%
  • ISFP

    2 11.76%
  • ESFP

    4 23.53%
  • ISTJ

    1 5.88%
  • ESTJ

    0 0%
  • ESTP

    0 0%
  • ISTP

    0 0%
  • INFJ

    0 0%
  • INFP

    1 5.88%
  • ENFJ

    0 0%
  • ENFP

    0 0%
  • INTJ

    5 29.41%
  • ENTJ

    0 0%
  • ENTP

    0 0%
  • INTP

    1 5.88%
Closed Thread
Hello Guest! Sign up to join the discussion below...
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24
Thank Tree53Thanks

This is a discussion on Who are the losers? within the INTJ Forum - The Scientists forums, part of the NT's Temperament Forum- The Intellects category; INTJs only please: Using your very own, subjective and personal standards, who in your opinion are the losers of all ...

  1. #1
    INTJ - The Scientists


    Who are the losers?

    INTJs only please: Using your very own, subjective and personal standards, who in your opinion are the losers of all 16 MBTI types?

    You may elaborate on your personal opinion, i.e. which standards are you using to form your judgement.
    Quick reply to this message Reply  



  2. #2
    INTJ - The Scientists

    I would say ESFP. They have all the traits I consider really bad.
    Quick reply to this message Reply  

  3. #3
    INTJ - The Scientists

    Quote Originally Posted by Daimai View Post
    I would say ESFP. They have all the traits I consider really bad.
    Wait..

    Se - Fi - Te - Ni


    Hmmm.....
    Zero11, bionic, Hemoglobin and 8 others thanked this post.
    Quick reply to this message Reply  

  4. #4
    INTJ - The Scientists

    Quote Originally Posted by tooboku View Post
    Wait..

    Se - Fi - Te - Ni


    Hmmm.....
    Yes, Se and Fi in control? Wouldnt want to get anywhere near that shit.
    freddo thanked this post.
    Quick reply to this message Reply  

  5. #5
    INTJ - The Scientists

    You kidding?

    We use Se and Fi just as much as they do, we're just not as concious of it. When our Se and Fi get out of control, we're gonna have bigger problems then they are because we don't conciously address them on a regular basis.

    Ever seen a drunk INTJ? We're the worst.
    Cookie Monster, bionic, SquareWave and 1 others thanked this post.
    Quick reply to this message Reply  

  6. #6
    INTJ - The Scientists


    Quote Originally Posted by tooboku View Post
    Ever seen a drunk INTJ? We're the worst.
    No, tell me. How's a drunk INTJ? I think I'll drink tonight. I wanna know what I will turn into.

    I'm sure, though, that I don't use Se and Fi as much as other types.
    Quick reply to this message Reply  

  7. #7
    INTJ - The Scientists

    Quote Originally Posted by tooboku View Post
    You kidding?

    We use Se and Fi just as much as they do, we're just not as concious of it. When our Se and Fi get out of control, we're gonna have bigger problems then they are because we don't conciously address them on a regular basis.

    Ever seen a drunk INTJ? We're the worst.
    Yes, but unlike other people using those functions, I dont annoy myself using them.
    Quick reply to this message Reply  

  8. #8
    ENTP - The Visionaries


    ESFP are your shadow type.
    Saying you find everything about them bad is stereotypical.
    userslon thanked this post.
    Quick reply to this message Reply  

  9. #9
    ENTP - The Visionaries

    A "loser" type? Really?
    bethdeth, Apollo Celestio, bionic and 9 others thanked this post.
    Quick reply to this message Reply  

  10. #10
    INTJ - The Scientists

    Quote Originally Posted by patria View Post
    No, tell me. How's a drunk INTJ? I think I'll drink tonight. I wanna know what I will turn into.

    I'm sure, though, that I don't use Se and Fi as much as other types.
    Eh. You do that.

    You're clinging to this sense of superiority with an underdeveloped Fi and you don't even realize it.

    This whole superiority thing some of you guys have is without merit.

    I dare you to challenge my ESFP mother to a game of Scrabble. She'll clean the floor with most of you.

    MBTI in itself has very little scientific value to date, so all you INTJs who are supposed to be scientists are throwing yourselves into a paradox by claiming intellectualy superiority by justification via an unscientific field of psychology. You're defeating your own prupose.

    This thread needs to be deleted.
    Quick reply to this message Reply  


 

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself. *Note* To protect our forum from spam, we require all users to verify their email. We will send you a confirmation email after you've created an account. Be sure to check your "spam" box if you don't receive it in your inbox.

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Similar Threads

  1. teachers calling kids losers??!!
    By la musa candido in forum Current Events
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 03-17-2010, 07:58 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:03 AM.
Information provided on the site is meant to complement and not replace any advice or information from a health professional.
2014 PersonalityCafe