The (stream of conscious?) venting thread for INTJ.


Hello Guest! Sign up to join the discussion below...
Page 900 of 1862 FirstFirst ... 40080085089089889990090190291095010001400 ... LastLast
Results 8,991 to 9,000 of 18619
Thank Tree35847Thanks

This is a discussion on The (stream of conscious?) venting thread for INTJ. within the INTJ Forum - The Scientists forums, part of the NT's Temperament Forum- The Intellects category; Originally Posted by Einsteinette 'sigh' Another falling soldier... I 'll miss having you around. I hope this is going to ...

  1. #8991
    INTJ - The Scientists


    Quote Originally Posted by Einsteinette View Post
    'sigh' Another falling soldier... I 'll miss having you around. I hope this is going to be temporary and you'll be back soon :(
    Not planning for it to be temporary, I am afraid. It was good knowing you though, and thanks to all of you.

    Wake, bethdeth, CounterPoint and 7 others thanked this post.

  2. #8992
    INTJ - The Scientists

    Quote Originally Posted by lirulin View Post
    Not planning for it to be temporary, I am afraid. It was good knowing you though, and thanks to all of you.
    What? Nooooooooo....

    Sigh....
    bethdeth and Abraxas thanked this post.

  3. #8993
    INTJ - The Scientists

    Quote Originally Posted by Hermes View Post
    Ok can some one explain how Quantum Zeno effect actually works? (In theory that is, not the mathematics behind it)
    6 Scientific Discoveries That Laugh in the Face of Physics | Cracked.com

    #5 is one of the simplest explanations I have seen.

    A lot of quantum physics seems like smoke and mirrors trying to cover up just how much of it doesn't make sense.
    That's why they are trying to create string theory, because quantum physics is basically broken. But they can't even agree on string theory yet because each different theory works in some cases and falls flat on its ass in others.

    That the speed of light isn't the limit, and gravity's failure at the quantum level Provs that absolutely nothing our science is founded on is true.

    Thanks to the overly political, nearly religious, nature of the scientific community it will take another decade before they agree it's time to just start over.
    Eylrid, Hermes, luemb and 1 others thanked this post.

  4. #8994
    INTJ - The Scientists

    Quote Originally Posted by lirulin View Post
    Not planning for it to be temporary, I am afraid. It was good knowing you though, and thanks to all of you.
    I really liked hearing from you, your posts were always worth reading. You will be missed.
    Napoleptic thanked this post.

  5. #8995
    INTJ - The Scientists

    Quote Originally Posted by Monkey Fritz View Post
    6 Scientific Discoveries That Laugh in the Face of Physics | Cracked.com

    #5 is one of the simplest explanations I have seen.

    A lot of quantum physics seems like smoke and mirrors trying to cover up just how much of it doesn't make sense.
    That's why they are trying to create string theory, because quantum physics is basically broken. But they can't even agree on string theory yet because each different theory works in some cases and falls flat on its ass in others.

    That the speed of light isn't the limit, and gravity's failure at the quantum level Provs that absolutely nothing our science is founded on is true.

    Thanks to the overly political, nearly religious, nature of the scientific community it will take another decade before they agree it's time to just start over.
    That was pretty good, although only #6 and #4 were new to me. However, here's the answer to #4. They just had some unaccounted-for heat loss from the satellite.
    Monkey Fritz, Hermes and Abraxas thanked this post.

  6. #8996
    INTJ - The Scientists

    Quote Originally Posted by Monkey Fritz View Post
    6 Scientific Discoveries That Laugh in the Face of Physics | Cracked.com

    #5 is one of the simplest explanations I have seen.
    You know that article is how I found out about this (I think it was number 2 where they talked about watching decaying isotopes took a while to find what it was actually called), it's just it didn't give any possible reasons as to why it was like and I knew that at least some of the other problems had theories explaining them ( even if they more than one).
    Monkey Fritz thanked this post.

  7. #8997
    INTJ - The Scientists

    Quote Originally Posted by Monkey Fritz View Post
    I started, but I'm just too scared to read that thread.
    I just looked at that thread again. 17 pages! (x2 for everyone else because I changed my settings to 20 post per page.) I'm scared too.
    Monkey Fritz thanked this post.

  8. #8998
    INTJ - The Scientists

    Quote Originally Posted by Hermes View Post
    You know that article is how I found out about this (I think it was number 2 where they talked about watching decaying isotopes took a while to find what it was actually called), it's just it didn't give any possible reasons as to why it was like and I knew that at least some of the other problems had theories explaining them ( even if they more than one).
    Like they said, that one is still kind of... Ignored.

    I believe that is one thing they expect the discovery of the Higgs Boson to solve. I seem to remember one theory involving some sort of friction with the HB causing the appearence of gravity's effect decreasing.

    This is one of these cases where "theory" is a pretty strong word. "Guess" would be more accurate. Especially when the HB seems less and less likely to actually exist.
    Hermes thanked this post.

  9. #8999
    Unknown Personality

    Quote Originally Posted by Monkey Fritz View Post
    6 Scientific Discoveries That Laugh in the Face of Physics | Cracked.com

    #5 is one of the simplest explanations I have seen.

    A lot of quantum physics seems like smoke and mirrors trying to cover up just how much of it doesn't make sense.
    That's why they are trying to create string theory, because quantum physics is basically broken. But they can't even agree on string theory yet because each different theory works in some cases and falls flat on its ass in others.

    That the speed of light isn't the limit, and gravity's failure at the quantum level Provs that absolutely nothing our science is founded on is true.

    Thanks to the overly political, nearly religious, nature of the scientific community it will take another decade before they agree it's time to just start over.


    "Wizards. We're chalking it up to wizards."
    Eylrid, Monkey Fritz, Hermes and 2 others thanked this post.

  10. #9000
    Unknown Personality

    Quote Originally Posted by Psychological Types
    Now, when the orientation to the object and to objective facts is so predominant that the most frequent and essential decisions and actions are determined, not by subjective values but by objective relations, one speaks of an extraverted attitude. When this is habitual, one speaks of an extraverted type. If a man so thinks, feels, and acts, in a word so lives, as to correspond directly with objective conditions and their claims, whether in a good sense or ill, he is extraverted. His life makes it perfectly clear that it is the objective rather than the subjective value which plays the greater role as the determining factor of his consciousness. He naturally has subjective values, but their determining power has less importance than the external objective conditions. Never, therefore, does he expect to find any absolute factors in his own inner life, since the only ones he knows are outside himself. Epimetheus-like, his inner life succumbs to the external necessity, not of course without a struggle; which, however, always ends in favour of the objective determinant. His entire consciousness looks outwards to the world, because the important and decisive determination always comes to him from without. But it comes to him from without, only because that is where he expects it. All the distinguishing characteristics of his psychology, in so far as they do not arise from the priority of one definite psychological function or from individual peculiarities, have their origin in this basic attitude. Interest and attention follow objective happenings and, primarily, those of the immediate environment. Not only persons, but things, seize and rivet his interest. His actions, therefore, are also governed by the influence of persons and things. They are directly related to objective data and determinations, and are, as it were, exhaustively explainable on these grounds. Extraverted action is recognizably related to objective conditions. In so far it is not purely reactive to environmental stimuli, it character is constantly applicable to the actual circumstances, and it finds adequate and appropriate play within the limits of the objective situation. It has no serious tendency to transcend these bounds. The same holdsgood for interest: objective occurrences have a well-nigh inexhaustible charm, so that in the normal course the extravert's interest makes no other claims
    In case you ever wonder sometimes if you are actually an ENTJ.

    Also, how to spot an extravert effortlessly.
    luemb and Faklubrejle thanked this post.


 

Similar Threads

  1. [INFP] Extremely conscious of our bodies?
    By 123mouton in forum INFP Forum - The Idealists
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 02-21-2013, 07:55 AM
  2. Jung's Conscious Attitudes (Dominant E/I)
    By Functianalyst in forum Myers Briggs Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-06-2011, 08:50 PM
  3. (Sub)Conscious Processes + [Superficial?] Observations of Behaviour
    By Linesky in forum Critical Thinking & Philosophy
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-11-2010, 05:13 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:14 PM.
Information provided on the site is meant to complement and not replace any advice or information from a health professional.
© PersonalityCafe - All rights reserved.