[Faklubrejle]

Or when you come up with an extremely short one that no one would ever think of.

" No1? "?

[Pavane]

" No1? "?

Not quite. :P

[Eylrid]

"brtfrc"

..

[Faklubrejle]

When, out of curiosity, you google images for {...} and think:
"sad"



Wow, what peace and quiet, with mild weather to boot! The ground might be cold, but feels good nevertheless.




Out for a walk, are you? Or waiting for a friend? You must have a pretty chill day. What cool stuff are you thinking about in the meantime?




A cool image. It confronts the beauty we merely imagine with the human condition and coldness of the void our planet roams. At least it gives me that feel. The girl has very narrow irides, because she's taking in too much light. Yes, to really see can be disturbing. It's a dirty job but someone's gotta do it!


"lonely"



A poor combination of footwear, wet sand and clothing. The man doesn't seem to care, his focus is on the horizon. He fears the water.




What a sight to see with naked eyes. The person must be putting hands together to heat them, or in awe. Possibly lost their gloves.




If we ignore the further part of the pool, the man can be perceived as stationary, because no leg movement is observable. Yes, it takes effort to stay at one place. And sometimes when we think our progress is halted, we are really doing a good job. Fearing and avoiding a task is worse than trying and persevering. There certainly exists a kind of thought that is negative. Thing that should be obvious, but I don't think people follow: Get to know your mind, and use it well! Order is irrelevant, one feeds off of the other. What does the pigeon mean? Well, you have to look beyond to realize what you are missing (you see it through the pool, not directly). But even then, the evanescence and uncertainty -flight of the bird- make that thing's value rather dubious.
EDIT: A man who gets to know himself suddenly has 4 legs.
Fascinating surface/color play.




Sitting after hours of walking/ lacking footwear. I get a very comfy feeling from many of the photos.




There are better places to sit, do not obstruct the walkway. Geez, sitting like that would make me feel bad and contraproductive too!

[repulse]

You know you're an INTJ when:

-Your friend tells you he/she thinks you could kill someone and get away with it (and you agree);
-You thought " ^^ " was raised eyebrows...until someone told you it was eyes; and
-You think of hundreds of scenarios that could happen the next day.

[repulse]

Double post..

[aiba99]

I saw a sepia-toned photograph some time ago of a canoe pulled up on a pebble beach in the twilight. I read the image as the relief and coziness of coming home at the end of a day/excursion and no longer needing to use the canoe to travel to places where one would rather not be. It was the contentment of accomplishment and time for restoration of soul. . .

Then I saw the title of the picture--something to do with adventure, setting out, new beginnings and opportunities. It almost made me want to cry that the "official" interpretation was the polar opposite of what I saw.
@Faklubrejle 's photos made me think of that.

[carlaviii]

...you join a MBI community for the purpose of better understanding the characters in the novel you're writing. After "channeling" them while taking the test, you're glad to see they aren't carbon copies of you but their logic is not like your logic. Must research and understand. Must.

But once you join, you're obsessively fascinated by your own type-forum.

[Faklubrejle]

... for the sake of mental stimulation and objectivity you "like" some alternative independent news group on facebook, that shits on NATO and US policy, reports alleged inconsistencies and absent events in news, that sort of thing. Or you read some fragments from works of authors with ideology you do not like.

On FB, there has been a post recently, noting NATO and US military aggressions (and their damage control) over past three decades; written in quite a nasty style. You do not react with strong emotions, but you make a long post where you outline your understanding. The half-truths and facts of the past do not REALLY matter that much, so you are not mad about them and are not willing to nitpick the original post on this grounds; the data required to build a conception of long-term international causes and fragmentations of mankind is already abundant, and sides can be picked easily. You subtly criticise inappropriety of moral "objectivism", noting that people in power inherently have perspective- moral objectivism would then cloud our predictive judgement, because our psychological projections would be misleading. Then you predict the nature of events for decades to come, with some degree of pessimism. To top it off, you playfully criticise logic of the OP, where has been stated that sovereign Iran is threatened by the possibility of war. If a sovereign territory would certainly change the ultimate leader, it can not be called sovereign, and the leader is not really a leader in the bigger picture. "Sovereignty" would falsely imply that the current local power is the highest possible in years to come. And we want to understand events unfolding in "years to come".

[Hett]

When you, in doubt between two LEGO Star Wars sets you like greatly, and only managing to buy one, you first see the sets as a whole and then compare the number of pieces, minifigs, special features and usefulness. Then you proceed to the check out with the chosen one.

When you keep giving instructions to your cataclysmically disorganized INFP friend to get him to clean his spaces, and you don't understand how he manages to fail at each single time.