[Surreal Breakfast]

Another what pisses you off about thread, am I popular now?

[de l'eau salée]

LOL, you must hate INTJs if you singled 'em out for this thread, eh? Haha

Getting back to the topic though,
A few seem cold and also have a sense of high pride. They aren't the kind of person I'd go for support.
Not sure if this is the case for all of them, but yeah.

[Surreal Breakfast]

LOL, you must hate INTJs if you singled 'em out for this thread, eh? Haha

I was gonna make threads about how ENTPs, INFPs, ENTJs and ISTPs piss me off, but some others already made them

[NephilimAzrael]

I hate that INTJs have issues with how ignorant the general populus are to getting to the root of problems.

[snail]

They tend to be stubborn in arguments. They can be arrogant, especially about their intelligence, and have questionable morals.
They often form ideas in their heads better than they communicate them, then expect to be understood the first time they express something regardless of a lack of clarity.

[DayLightSun]

I hate that INTJs have issues with how ignorant the general populus are to getting to the root of problems.

I have the same problem. Damn ENTJs. Cut the fun out of mystery.

How cold and cut throat they can be.

[NephilimAzrael]

They tend to be stubborn in arguments. They can be arrogant, especially about their intelligence, and have questionable morals.
They often form ideas in their heads better than they communicate them, then expect to be understood the first time they express something regardless of a lack of clarity.

Being arrogant, as Zulban's signature, does not apply if you are right.
I will claim a counter to your moral suggestion.
- Morality when taken at face-value or prescribed is not morality, it lacks validity under the condition of being void of free-will.

Well, of course the intelligent INTJs are intelligent, and may appear arrogant due to those communication barriers which you mentioned. Yet, even the use of simple terms, denounces the full power of language, which any INTJ I have encountered has proven to find important if not tantamount to a contented life. Communication being that two-way system that provides obstacles for any individual is just that, a two-way system. In as such, if one is speaking in ways that do not convene with the other's ingrained utterances, then there will be difficulty. Here comes the most arrogant part; If intelligence is so disagreeable for feeler types, then go away. In terms of discussing something with another person, the introverted intuition of a thinking judger is enough to understand clearly what you are trying to say, condensing it down into as laconic a phrase as is needed and giving it back to you with improvement.

I am surprised at how specific your post was snail, as it does not seem to encompass JoeMetallic, Indigo, Psicholomeo, Allana, etc. in regard to their posting habits.

How cold and cut throat they can be.

Caught us on that one, ENTJ!

[de l'eau salée]

Being arrogant, as Zulban's signature, does not apply if you are right.
I will claim a counter to your moral suggestion.
:

I hate that quote in his signature. It just doesn't make sense to me. Why isn't it considered arrogance if you're right when it would be if you're wrong? The quote is arrogant in its own. Please enlighten me :)

[NephilimAzrael]

Arrogance:
The act or habit of arrogating, or making undue claims in an overbearing manner; that species of pride which consists in exorbitant claims of rank, dignity, estimation, or power, or which exalts the worth or importance of the person to an undue degree; proud contempt of others; lordliness; haughtiness; self-assumption; presumption.


If one is correct on the matter, it is not making an exorbitant claim of importance. Of course that would be a case of being pretentious also, so fundamentally -if you are wrong, you are wrong. There is no two ways about it on general terms. It does not mean that the wrong person is being denounced or looked down upon, it just means its not their best suit. Simple.

[de l'eau salée]

Arrogance:
The act or habit of arrogating, or making undue claims in an overbearing manner; that species of pride which consists in exorbitant claims of rank, dignity, estimation, or power, or which exalts the worth or importance of the person to an undue degree; proud contempt of others; lordliness; haughtiness; self-assumption; presumption.


If one is correct on the matter, it is not making an exorbitant claim of importance. Of course that would be a case of being pretentious also, so fundamentally -if you are wrong, you are wrong. There is no two ways about it on general terms. It does not mean that the wrong person is being denounced or looked down upon, it just means its not their best suit. Simple.

Meh, I suppose I didn't look far enough into the meaning of arrogance, then.
There's just something about INTJ's that kind of bothers me. I might just be intimidated though...If it's not arrogance, maybe it's because they're really smart, and they know they're really smart.