[ChanceyRose]

@Boolean11, I'm not particularly good at making prophetic-like predictions like what @Adnan Syed mentioned but I am pretty good at making short-term predictions based on past behavior and a healthy dose of 'that just makes sense.'

[Adnan Syed]

@Boolean11, I'm not particularly good at making prophetic-like predictions like what @Adnan Syed mentioned but I am pretty good at making short-term predictions based on past behavior and a healthy dose of 'that just makes sense.'

Im just cool like that *nodds*. ahahahahahahahahah

[ChanceyRose]

that sounds like superstition boy, I think you just might be an ISTx who's aware of their intuition... though in all seriousness I'm starting to believe that it is true for most INTJs here. I see intuition as actively creating models, seeking relationships between various patterns then using Te to check the degree to which the model correlates with reality (the process is repeated till something is understood) and after that I'd get bored and move to new things to intuit.

Intuition doesn't act, it receives/perceives. 'Actively creating models, seeking relationships' is the function of either Feeling or Thinking. In the case of an INTJ, it is Te.

If the world around you is water then Intuition (or Sensation) is the pitcher into which it is being poured. The pitcher doesn't do anything with the water, just holds it. The judging functions of Thinking and Feeling decide what to do.

[Adnan Syed]

Intuition doesn't act, it receives/perceives. 'Actively creating models, seeking relationships' is the function of either Feeling or Thinking. In the case of an INTJ, it is Te.

If the world around you is water then Intuition (or Sensation) is the pitcher into which it is being poured. The pitcher doesn't do anything with the water, just holds it. The judging functions of Thinking and Feeling decide what to do.

WOW! You really take this seriously :| :p Im glad you do ;)

By the way what do you think i am? from your point of view?

[Isis]

I predict I'm going to eat lunch in 2.5 hours and that it will be a taco salad.

I predict that you will receive a virtual rutabaga

Citrus_fruits.jpg

curses...foiled again

[Boolean11]

Intuition doesn't act, it receives/perceives. 'Actively creating models, seeking relationships' is the function of either Feeling or Thinking. In the case of an INTJ, it is Te.

If the world around you is water then Intuition (or Sensation) is the pitcher into which it is being poured. The pitcher doesn't do anything with the water, just holds it. The judging functions of Thinking and Feeling decide what to do.

How did you come up with that theory from Jung work (which I'm thinking you've read since you've been here since 2010) on what "subjective" and "objective" functions are?

Classics in the History of Psychology -- Jung (1921/1923) Chapter 10

[ChanceyRose]

WOW! You really take this seriously :| :p Im glad you do ;)

By the way what do you think i am? from your point of view?

I do. It's helped me understand myself in a way no other tool has been able to.

As to what you are, I'd say you're human.

Seriously, though, I haven't seen enough of your posts nor do I know very much about you to even hazard a guess as to your MBTI type. If you'd like to take the time to fill out a Type Me questionnaire What's My Type Questionnaire and post a thread in this subforum What's my personality type?, I'd be happy to help you.

[ChanceyRose]

How did you come up with that theory from Jung work (which I'm thinking you've read since you've been here since 2010) on what "subjective" and "objective" functions are?

Classics in the History of Psychology -- Jung (1921/1923) Chapter 10

I didn't say anything about 'subjective' and 'objective' which refer to 'introverted' and 'extraverted' and are attitudes, not functions.

[Green Girl]

I can relate to making relationships between less obvious patterns, but "prediction" is hard for me to take since I have to consciously validate the bizarre ideas/(relationships between intuitions) I come up with through Te. But I guess if you mean notices relationships between strange patterns then I can agree, though they would have to be consciously evaluated.

Yeah, I don't mean Ni is always right, far from it. I meant that I suspect that dominant Ni users are more aware of the process and more aware of these patterns than most people, so can more easily evaluate the validity of their "hunches" using Te.

[Boolean11]

I didn't say anything about 'subjective' and 'objective' which refer to 'introverted' and 'extraverted' and are attitudes, not functions.

If you read it you'd understand that introverted functions build models through the subjective ordering of the work they perform. Which can be either sensing intuition thinking or feelings. They are said to have "order" which creates the models. And also they work with their extroverted counter function which serves as a slave for them. Extroverted functions operate in the outer world and thus they don't order the data they produce since it meant to be used by the introverted helper functions. Te will be driven by perception regardless of whether the user is introverted or extroverted.