Thread of Random Thoughts and Ideas

**Raichan** · 07-20-2012 03:35 PM

Okay so far June/July I've watched Prometheus, The Amazing Spiderman, A thousand words, Men in Black III..

Can't wait to watch Ted sometime..Looks hilarious! And from the Creator of Family Guy

**Wanderlust94** · 07-20-2012 03:48 PM

Originally Posted by Raichan

Okay so far June/July I've watched Prometheus, The Amazing Spiderman, A thousand words, Men in Black III..

Can't wait to watch Ted sometime..Looks hilarious! And from the Creator of Family Guy

I went and saw it with a few buds. If you don't mind low brow and high brow comedy all in one movie, then I promise you won't be disappointed with this movie. I was a little bit worried with how Seth was going to do for his first movie but it was hilarious!

**Wanderlust94** · 07-20-2012 04:01 PM

So while doing random wikipedia searches I came across a very controversial photographer. I have already forgotten his name but I followed some links to his works and found out why there is a fuss. He takes photos of underaged girls. Usually just reaching their teen years. Now it wasn't child smut, but the kick was that's ALL he takes photos of. So yeah I think this photographer is weird and probably a very perverted person. I'm not a prude. The nude is quite a beautiful thing, but when it's constantly the only thing you take photos of and these girls are like only 13, then I'm sorry if you consider it your art, it's still fucking weird to only focus on that. I felt a little guilty for seeing his works though. I would hate if someone found out and thought I enjoyed those photos. Also the government of Australia, where this guy is located, ruled in his favor that it's not child smut. Which is weird. They seem to censor so many other things. Long story short is I feel guilty for following the link and this guy is definitely a weirdo. What would you guys say in this situation? Agree he's a weirdo, or do you think it's art?

**Mitsuko** · 07-20-2012 04:44 PM

I'm assuming that's not a rhetorical question...
I'd say it is a form of art, but that doesn't make it "right," or any less creepy, etc.
I'm curious who let the girls have their picture taken. =X

Unrelated to above:
Date, or introverted hang out...? That is the social-context-question of the day.

**Wanderlust94** · 07-20-2012 05:00 PM

Originally Posted by Mitsuko

I'm assuming that's not a rhetorical question...
I'd say it is a form of art, but that doesn't make it "right," or any less creepy, etc.
I'm curious who let the girls have their picture taken. =X

Unrelated to above:
Date, or introverted hang out...? That is the social-context-question of the day.

Not rhetorical. Also, although I prefer hang out, try the date if I'm not reading the question wrong. Gain some social skills.

**Mitsuko** · 07-20-2012 06:03 PM

Thanks! I'll keep that in mind... but it was more wondering what it was. I usually assume people are being nice, and not assume any further attachment/meaning. ...ambiguous situations could be a date, or two introverts hanging out. =P Or just one introvert hanging with an ambivert/extrovert, etc.

Either way I'll get social skills, haha.

Turns out they're usually dates. ^_^;

**Milkshakes** · 07-20-2012 06:45 PM

I need to get this out of my head >.<

Good at sports = S. Organised = J. Talks with everyone = E. Umm...

**Wanderlust94** · 07-20-2012 06:49 PM

Originally Posted by Mitsuko

Thanks! I'll keep that in mind... but it was more wondering what it was. I usually assume people are being nice, and not assume any further attachment/meaning. ...ambiguous situations could be a date, or two introverts hanging out. =P Or just one introvert hanging with an ambivert/extrovert, etc.

Either way I'll get social skills, haha.

Turns out they're usually dates. ^_^;

I have the exact opposite issue. When someone (Usually female about my age) shows me any kind of attention, I tend to think, and hope, that it means they're interested in dating me. Obviously not the case. You should consider yourself lucky!

**RoughEstimate** · 07-20-2012 07:10 PM

Finally got my lucid dreams back.
I was sitting in a hotel room with my little brother and he was speaking, but not audibly.
I smiled and said "Brian! We're dreaming!"
He looked confused.
"Oh, shit. No, I'm dreaming."
This was the first lucid dream that I've been lucid for from nearly its beginning.
I was too stoked to do anything aside from find a portal (the television in the room) and fly through colorful dimensions, all the while thinking "What should I do?"
I'm just glad they're back, I'll work on dreamscapes when I have a better handle on them.
Other than that, my dreams have been bordering between somber nightmares and dreamy museums.

**silverlark** · 07-20-2012 07:39 PM

Originally Posted by Wanderlust94

So while doing random wikipedia searches I came across a very controversial photographer. I have already forgotten his name but I followed some links to his works and found out why there is a fuss. He takes photos of underaged girls. Usuall just reaching their teen years. Now it wasn't child smut, but the kick was that's ALL he takes photos of. So yeah I think this photographer is weird and probably a very perverted person. I'm not a prude. The nude is quite a beautiful thing,but when it's constantly the only thing you take photos of and these girls are like only 13, then I'm sorry if you consider art, it's still fucking weird to only focus on that. I felt a little guilty for seeing his works though. I would hate if someone found out and thought I enjoyed those photos. Also the government of Australia, where this guy is located, ruled in his favor that it's not child smut. Which is weird. They seem to censor so many other things. Long story short is I feel guilty for following the link and this guy is definitely a weirdo. What would you guys say in this situation? Agree he's a weirdo, or do you think it's art?

it's not alright, not a bit. if it was you wouldn't feel shame for looking at them...