INFJ thoughts on "the one", "soul mates", and the idea of settling


Hello Guest! Sign up to join the discussion below...
Page 1 of 18 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 180
Thank Tree409Thanks

This is a discussion on INFJ thoughts on "the one", "soul mates", and the idea of settling within the INFJ Forum - The Protectors forums, part of the NF's Temperament Forum- The Dreamers category; I've been mulling this over ever since responding to the thread on whether or not an INFJ will ever be ...

  1. #1
    INFJ - The Protectors

    INFJ thoughts on "the one", "soul mates", and the idea of settling

    I've been mulling this over ever since responding to the thread on whether or not an INFJ will ever be satisfied in terms of love and relationships. I'd love to hear more thoughts on the INFJ view of a satisfying relationship and how they expect it to happen. Is anything less than instantaneous attraction or "spark" considered settling or lowering one's standards? Please read the exerpt from my response from the other thread.

    Here is what I ponder. I'm not sure it's so much about finding the "perfect" person for you but rather someone who cares enough to work at it. At some point, someone will have to appreciate us for who we are to the core but it may be up to us to communicate (in their terms) who we are. If they care, they will see it - otherwise they may just laugh it off and tell us we are nuts! I've always believed that there is the possibility of that so-called perfect, "meant to be" relationship. Two souls that touch one another and stick, soul mates, "the one"...how many other terms can I come up with? In any case, we need to accept that there will be euphoric highs in a relationship, just as there will be heart crushing lows. When you have 2 people that have separate emotions - unpredictable are our emotions - it will not ALWAYS be perfect. As INFJ's we strive for perfection because we know it's possible - if we can imagine it - it has to exist. This in some respects is one of our pitfalls. We fear the term "settling" or are haunted by the fact that maybe the next person is better for us. Maybe, we were meant to inspire someone past a point they are naturally able to.

    Ponder this. I see myself as being the type of person that can see from point A to point Z, and everything in between. Someone else may only see what's possible between point A and point T. If I were to choose to enter a relationship with said person, does this mean that I'm settling because they can only see to point T? Or, if I communicate and lead this person past T and they are open enough to explore that...will they eventually reach Z? Some may argue that perhaps this person will never reach Z, and that is a real possibility. What we live with as NIFJs is wondering if the person standing next to the A/T guy or gal is an A/Z person just like we are. Maybe they are an A/X person but they don't have the openess to move beyond that or maybe they are only an A/D person - it's hard to say! And to futher ponder...what if that person were A/ZZ? Just imagine what some people think we may be missing out on!

    Jorji, Beefpatrol, Rune and 20 others thanked this post.

  2. #2
    Unknown Personality

    I find this romantic idealism really attractive and beautiful, but you may be making it a bit hard for anyone to fit that 'perfect' soulmate partner.

  3. #3
    INFJ - The Protectors

    "if we can imagine it - it has to exist." my thought's exactly. If "soul mates" are out there crossing path's will be the hard part.
    I am always up to a challenge.
    angularvelocity, pajamiez, beanz and 10 others thanked this post.

  4. #4
    INFJ - The Protectors

    Willy -
    That's just it. That is why I pose the question. Perhaps we do make it too difficult to find that "perfect" person. Maybe that person and ourselves need to be cultivated into the type of relationship we desire. I just wanted to see what everyone else would say about it. Considering where I live, the odds of me meeting my "cosmic" companion is pretty much slim to none - so it made me ponder!
    Sovia and Morphyous thanked this post.

  5. #5
    INFJ - The Protectors

    Reality would more likely reflect something along the lines of:

    - You, Waterviolet, can see [A1 to Z1]. However, while you like [G1, L1, S1, V1 and X1], you want [B1, L1 and V1] and you need [G1, H1, V1 and X1].

    - A potential partner of yours can see [A1 to T1] and [R2 to U2], likes [insert whatever], wants [insert whatever] and needs [insert whatever].


    Fine, you might be able to "see everything in-between" the limits of the two points along your perceived line (segment), but whatever we are talking about probably has more dimensions.

    Basically I'm extending your "they might be able to see from A to ZZ" point*, except, you probably cant see "everything in-between" yourself (nor would they), and there is bound to be something they can see between A and Z that you missed.

    (*= Well, I would have said "E to AC" to convey that you two are bound to be able to see (some) different things and it would be unlikely that one of you could see everything the other can plus more.)


    Say that there is just one thing they can see that you don't - would they be settling for you? If you want to think that way, well at least you're settling for each other (if you can see at least one thing they can't).

    But you know what? If they can't see something that you think is meaningful or whatever, drag them past their sight to experience it and you shall be the mystical entity who allowed them to do so.


    Also my other point is that some of the things you can "see" you probably don't like, want or need anyway.
    Jorji, agv, Beefpatrol and 7 others thanked this post.

  6. #6
    INFJ - The Protectors

    Oh boy...instead of inspiring me Garm you totally made my mind seize up! I'm sure there are lots of things I can't see, and even if I were to clone myself - my clone wouldn't have the same exact thought processes at the same exact time. So my clone wouldn't be the same person, with the same experiences defining my life even though we are genetically the same. Hence, I'm sure there is a lot of stuff I'm unaware of between A and Z but it was just a general idea of what could be ultimately possible - admittedly, others might see something different. Assuming that everyone starts out at A and general assumption that Z is the end of the alphabet it was just a fact of trying to visualize the possibilities in a way that everyone could imagine it. Anyhow, I think I need a nap now - reading your post wore me out. It would make for a good debate though! Now I can ponder what it is I want while at the same time not knowing what I need.

  7. #7
    INFJ - The Protectors

    Quote Originally Posted by waterviolet View Post
    I'm sure there are lots of things I can't see, and even if I were to clone myself - my clone wouldn't have the same exact thought processes at the same exact time. So my clone wouldn't be the same person, with the same experiences defining my life even though we are genetically the same.
    But at the same time, an individual who is not a clone of you could still have experienced similar situations as you had throughout life. Such an individual could end up seeing the same or at least a very close scope that you can.

    However, where is the benefit in that? One can't devleop and learn from a copy of themselves. Sure, sometimes the difference between two people is too much for anything to happen, in that area, between them, but once they are compatible enough, surely the more they can learn and develop from each other, the better?


    But anyways, basically I'm just saying that it's not so linear, we don't all start out at A (different cultures and upbringings and etc) and we all end up with crazy combinations at the end, and to be honest, I don't think there really is a "Z" unless it's omniscience or something.


    Nap well.
    Ethanol, Adamantya and MatchaBlizzard thanked this post.

  8. #8
    Unknown Personality

    I don’t think I believe in soul mates not because I'm not romantic but I believe we can get along and love more than one type of person and I don’t mean settling by that. What worries me the most is someone not accepting me for who I am that I have to hide some aspect of myself from them because if I do something part of my personality and I get criticized for it and they would want to change it then that would just be unacceptable...behaviors or habits can be changed no problem but the essence of who I am no. So I'm always afraid I won’t find someone like that and settling would mean I would have to hide part of me to get along with that person.
    Jorji, Beefpatrol, yellowbritt and 11 others thanked this post.

  9. #9
    INFJ - The Protectors

    Quote Originally Posted by MoonLight View Post
    behaviors or habits can be changed no problem but the essence of who I am no.
    Any chance you could clarify the difference between these a bit more? Maybe an example or two.

  10. #10
    Unknown Personality

    Quote Originally Posted by GarmGarf View Post
    Any chance you could clarify the difference between these a bit more? Maybe an example or two.
    Ok I have a habit of leaving certain things out of place but my sister wants things in order always so she would nag me to return them to their place, I can change that and I'm better at it now. On the other hand, I'm not what you call the follower types and the most hated thing for me is being told what to do if a man comes and starts tell me to do things his way without even asking me about my opinion or if I agree then I can't handle that actually if I have to settle for someone like that I would prefer to be alone.
    Poet Identity, Anima and cvinitak thanked this post.


 
Page 1 of 18 12311 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. [INFJ] On the note of the INFJ "doorslam" - the INFJ "shutter" manouvre
    By Gracie in forum INFJ Forum - The Protectors
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 04-17-2013, 06:23 PM
  2. Share your love for the "Firefly" TV series and its follow-up movie "Serenity"!
    By SweetSurrender in forum Book, Music, & Movie Reviews
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 04-13-2013, 05:25 AM
  3. INTP "Thinker" seeks ENTJ "Performer" as business partner
    By Melquiadez in forum ENTJ Forum - The Executives
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 02-03-2013, 04:38 AM
  4. INTP "Thinker" seeks ESFP "Performer" as business partner
    By Melquiadez in forum Education & Career Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-11-2013, 07:05 PM
  5. [ENTP] Media's "Mook" and "Midriff" --- ENTP and ESFP respectively??
    By sinistralpal in forum ENTP Forum- The Visionaries
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-06-2010, 02:18 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:35 AM.
Information provided on the site is meant to complement and not replace any advice or information from a health professional.
© PersonalityCafe - All rights reserved.