Theory of Self


Hello Guest! Sign up to join the discussion below...
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18
Thank Tree6Thanks

This is a discussion on Theory of Self within the General Psychology forums, part of the Topics of Interest category; SOURCE: Autism Aspergers Myths - The Theory of Mind Although there are many research works on autism, few address the ...

  1. #1

    Theory of Self

    SOURCE: Autism Aspergers Myths - The Theory of Mind

    Although there are many research works on autism, few address the subjective experience of autism. I propose that autistics have a different form of consciousness from non-autistics, which arose from their different experience of self.

    About the self
    Our self is not a fixed object, but a changing hologram-like system of sensations (of the body), emotions (and desires), thoughts (of facts and information), perception (the way we organized and judge information) and consciousness - the 5 "combinations" of the mind. The connections between these systems link the self together. Without these connections, the self does not function.

    With few connections, the self becomes dispersed and does not "awake" or become active. Thus, the person "sleepwalks". With unbalanced connections (too many in some areas and too little in others), the self becomes very awake in some parts and asleep in others. This distorts the inner experience of the person who then lives a distorted life.

    Comparisons
    My own experiences revealed the most striking aspects of the autistic consciousness:



    Theory of Mind
    Theory of Mind refers to the notion that many autistic individuals do not understand that other people have their own plans, thoughts, and points of view. Furthermore, it appears that they have difficulty understanding other people's beliefs, attitudes, and emotions.

    This passage might offend autistics because it sounds like this:

    I have no idea why autistic people think the way they do. Maybe it is because they are not socially intelligent enough to understand that other people do not think the same as them. Perhaps we can only make them understand by dumbing down social skills and then patiently teach them.

    I propose the "Theory of Self" as a substitute. The key is that:

    Autistics could not understand non-autistics because they do not have the experience of non-autistics.
    If they have such experiences, it will help them understand and adapt to mainstream society
    To experience this, they must recreate the sense of self as experienced by non-autistics
    People who are color blind could not imagine certain colors, but if we can let them catch a glimpse of colors, they will understand. If they spontaneously recover their sense of colors, their visual instincts will take over and help orientate them fast. Likewise, I believe that if only we can let the autistic catch a glimpse of how non-autistics experience life, it will aid them much in their development.

    Is the non-autistic column accurate? I have no idea what it is like to be non-autistic, but the autistic column is spot on. This theory explains why autistics do not seem to be as affected as non-autistics by the illusion of the free willing self.



  2. #2

    Im apparently middle autistic compared to this list. So... Do people like me have a name?



  3. #3

    Quote Originally Posted by NearsToys View Post
    Im apparently middle autistic compared to this list. So... Do people like me have a name?
    You might be on the autistic spectrum. Have you taken the aspie quiz?



  4. #4

    Quote Originally Posted by NearsToys View Post
    Im apparently middle autistic compared to this list. So... Do people like me have a name?
    I also fall into the autistic column more than the non-autistic column but I'm not autistic (well, the chances of me being autistic are very slim).



  5. #5

    Hmmm,

    -Fact/People base: Are these mutually exclusive?
    - I'm definately more concerned wih knowledge and analysis than fufilling ideas. I've often said my dream job would be to make a living learning new things rather than actually doing anything with it.
    -I don't think I understand the autistic side's. Emotions are very distinguishable as a conscious experience, but I don't relate to 'edges of consciousness.
    -I get overwhelmed by touch easily, and have poor tactile recall in my memory. I sometimes feel like I just watch life go by. Don't know to what extent they are implying for the autistic spectrum.
    -I used to relate to open boundary until I got hurt over and over again as I learned people are not like me. Closed now, definately.
    -I don't consider body language irrelevant, but sometimes it does take much to interpret it. Still, I lean on the non autistic side on this one.
    -This honestly makes me think introvert and extravert. I do not relate to the non autistic column in the least
    -I think I'm highly aware when my thoughts are not under my control. I feel like taking control takes effort. I do meditative excercises to exert control. So, I feel I can control them, but don't alway do so?

    This list is probably on to something, but the two sides don't always seem very opposed and most of the time I did not relate to either side.

    I have not been evaluated by any psychotherapist (in recent years) and do not have reason to believe I'm autistic.
    Posted via Mobile Device



  6. #6

    Maybe I'm an extreme example, but I cannot relate to any of the non-autistic traits.



  7. #7

    Quote Originally Posted by Marino View Post
    You might be on the autistic spectrum. Have you taken the aspie quiz?
    I can relate to some on both sides. Can I get a link to this quiz?



  8. #8

    Quote Originally Posted by NearsToys View Post
    I can relate to some on both sides. Can I get a link to this quiz?
    Aspie Quiz



  9. #9

    Well it saids i'm non-autistic......
    To me it seems I'm an extraverted autistic that trust no one and also is good in conversation and picks up verbal and non verbal clues.. If thats possible.....



  10. #10

    Marino, can you elaborate your point of view on the point "Emotions are on the edge of consciousness, tying together unexplainable areas"? I don't think I understand what is meant by that.
    Posted via Mobile Device




 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Bri Theory quiz
    By cardinalfire in forum Personality Test Resources
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 04-03-2013, 08:44 PM
  2. Between the theory and the Outside World
    By Gnothi Seauton in forum Myers Briggs Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-17-2010, 08:05 PM
  3. I have a theory
    By NotSoRighteousRob in forum What's my personality type?
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-12-2010, 05:13 PM
  4. Subconscience Theory
    By Cielnoir in forum General Psychology
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-03-2010, 11:52 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:32 PM.
Information provided on the site is meant to complement and not replace any advice or information from a health professional.
© PersonalityCafe - All rights reserved.