im a crackpot!

[url=http://www.xeromag.com/fun/personality.html]The REAL Personality Types Made Relevant[/url

lol]

I've seen it before. I think of this page as more entertainment than anything relevant.

The REAL Personality Types Made Relevant

There it is, I made it work whoopee

Originally Posted by JoeMetallic

I've seen it before. I think of this page as more entertainment than anything relevant.

Still, it's funny. I'm afraid I might get carried away with Fermat's last theorem or the applications of group theory. If I can find a vic- I mean, er, willing audience.

So, Joe. It says INTPs are best matched with INTJs. How about that?

Originally Posted by Surreal Breakfast

The REAL Personality Types Made Relevant

There it is, I made it work whoopee

thank you.
i just found this very funny

Originally Posted by nightriser13

So, Joe. It says INTPs are best matched with INTJs. How about that?

MB relationships are still a mystery to me. For my type I've heard ENTJ, ESTJ, INTJ, even ENFJ recommended to me as a life partner. I'm going to search this forum for this sort of thing now since I'm thoroughly confused.

Originally Posted by Zulban

MB relationships are still a mystery to me. For my type I've heard ENTJ, ESTJ, INTJ, even ENFJ recommended to me as a life partner. I'm going to search this forum for this sort of thing now since I'm thoroughly confused.

Haha, I don't seriously pay attention to that sort of thing, but I don't think I would do well with an SJ. I could be wrong, but I just don't see it happening.

Originally Posted by slightlybatty

thank you.
i just found this very funny

Oh, that's okay

I found it funny too (borderline hillarious even), especialy reading about my polar oppisites' description (ESTJ), the weird thing is that I didn't get offended by my types description when they're supposed to be making fun of the types.

Well since MB is so spot on sometimes, you might think it could have something to say with regards to relationships. Someone on the forum (I can't remember who) gave this chart once:

http://www.socionics.com/rel/relcht.htm

So there's definitly something going on... Personally I think it might have to do with the percents you recieve. Subtract 100% or so for traits that should be opposite and keep the same % for traits that should remain similar. I think that works... I would get a very low E, low N, very high T, very high J. Maybe I should start a thread since it looks like none have really been made to seriously discuss this.

Originally Posted by nightriser13

So, Joe. It says INTPs are best matched with INTJs. How about that?

Ooooh. What are you implying, Night? eh? EH? XD

To my knowledge, I only know one INTP in real life (that's my best guess for him, at least). He's pretty cool. Sometimes I envy the possibilities that a P could bring, but still, I'm extremely creative when necessary.