frankly, I don't trust that chart. I think it's more like
1s: Si
2: Fe
3: any, more Es
4: Ni
5: Ti, Ni
6w5: any, more Is and Ts
6w7s: any, more Es and Fs
7w6: Ne
7w8: Se
8: Te, Se
9: any, more Is
| | |
This is a discussion on Enneatypes corresponding to Jungian typology (according to Personality Types) within the Enneagram Personality Theory Forum forums, part of the Personality Type Forums category; frankly, I don't trust that chart. I think it's more like 1s: Si 2: Fe 3: any, more Es 4: ...
frankly, I don't trust that chart. I think it's more like
1s: Si
2: Fe
3: any, more Es
4: Ni
5: Ti, Ni
6w5: any, more Is and Ts
6w7s: any, more Es and Fs
7w6: Ne
7w8: Se
8: Te, Se
9: any, more Is

exception? no; less common? yes
Ne dom 7w8s are less common than Ne dom 7w6s and Se dom 7w8s. any MBTI type can be any enneagram type, but the list I proposed has more to do with the most likely combinations. I'm sure Riso and Hudson are generally a great source on the enneagram (and a lot more knowledgeable than me obviously) but frankly, I think they're way off here.
PS: lots of Fi dom 4s are mistyped 6w7s and 9w1s. I don't think they're as common as INFJ 4s
There are too many conflicting theories and I don't think it's good for people to rely on these at all.
Type Correlations
they're certainly not something to be "relied on" in terms of finding your type (if you are, say, an INFP 7w8, you are still a 7w8 and still an INFP). a general trend (enneagram/MBTI correlation) cannot be used to judge a single piece of data (an individual's MBTI and enneagram type). correlations are fine as long as you take them with a grain of salt and keep them in context

But this doesn't include the influence of the inferior, which I consider more relevant to enneagram.

Bookmarks