I mean The Roving ENFP has agreed on several occasions with claims I have made, but then persists to reject Feminism as a legitimate movement or field of study that is an unbiased nature. This doesn't make any sense to me for if the premises I present are valid and soundly follow each other, then the conclusion that follows next should be the same each and every time. Yet, it's not. That begs arbitrary thinking in my mind.
Any point that has been made logically only splits hairs on technicalities, which is quite an easy feat to accomplish given there are few absolute in this world. I have yet to see the bulk of any claim I have made adequately argued or argued at all.
If you don't want to waste your time with an intelligent discussion that is fine, though I will be honest and say I appreciated this discussion. It has helped me review my own beliefs while giving me experience with ideas that oppose mine. I never take my knowledge for granted, and I never assume I am right. In other words, I have taken every word into consideration, but just because I reject your words regardless doesn't insinuate I am closed-mnded. I mean I accept I could be wrong about some things, however I don't believe you are therefore right on other things. I have yet to be presented with compelling evidence. This is what most of your points lack, evidence; they seem to be mainly assumptions and generalizations of the masses' opinions and behaviors.