Ought humans be microchipped?

Ought humans be microchipped?

+ Reply to Thread
Hello Guest! Sign up to join the discussion below...
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26
Thank Tree21Thanks

This is a discussion on Ought humans be microchipped? within the The Debate Forum forums, part of the Topics of Interest category; ...

  1. #1

    Ought humans be microchipped?

    "A cloned chip could give criminals access to your health insurance or your medical files, said Kerr. A changed medical record could mean someone no longer qualifies for health insurance or put someone's health at risk. "For example if someone got into my health- care record they could take out the fact that I am deathly allergic to peanuts."

    "Kerr's main concern with the VeriChip, however, is that no one seems quite sure who should be in charge of regulating it. While some hospitals in the U.S. have implanted the chips, some people in Canada seem to be looking at the device like an extreme form of body piercing.

    ""My concern, first of all, is whether or not the chip is even playing the role of a medical device," he said, comparing it again to a MedicAlert bracelet. "That bracelet might save somebody's life, but it's not a medical device. It's something which is an identifier that can be applied in a way that has a good medical outcome, but it's not like a scalpel."" [1]

    "At the House hearing, state Rep. Ed Setzler (R-Kennesaw), who is shouldering the legislation in the House, spoke earnestly for better than a half hour on microchips as a literal invasion of privacy.

    "He was followed by a hefty woman who described herself as a resident of DeKalb County. “I’m also one of the people in Georgia who has a microchip,” the woman said. Slowly, she began to lead the assembled lawmakers down a path they didn’t want to take.
    "Microchips, the woman began, “infringe on issues that are fundamental to our very existence. Our rights to privacy, our rights to bodily integrity, the right to say no to foreign objects being put in our body.”" [2]

    "Although the FDA approved the VeriChip implant last week, their approval does not mean the device is completely safe, according to an FDA letter CASPIAN has obtained. The letter, dated October 12, 2004, was sent to Digital Angel Corporation and outlines a number of potential health risks associated with the device.

    "Among the potential problems the FDA identifies are: "adverse tissue reaction," "migration of the implanted transponder," "failure of implanted transponder," "electrical hazards" and "magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] incompatibilty." Not to mention the nasty needle stick from the "inserter" used to inject it. (The FDA lists "failure of inserter" -- a bloody possiblity we'd rather not contemplate -- among the risks.)"

    "The potential risks to health associated with the device are: adverse tissue reaction; migration of implanted transponder; compromised information
    security; failure of implanted transponder; failure of inserter; failure of
    electronic scanner; electromagnetic interference; electrical hazards;
    magnetic resonance imaging incompatibility; and needle stick. The special
    controls document aids in mitigating the risks by identifying performance
    and safety testing, and appropriate labeling. Thus, in addition to the
    general controls of the act, an Implantable Radiofrequency Transponder
    System for Patient Identification and Health Information is subject to the
    following special control: Class II Special Controls Guidance Document:
    Implantable Radiofrequency Transponder System for Patient Identification and
    Health Information."
    amanda32 thanked this post.

  2. #2
  3. #3

    Only if they want to.
    Lucem and Celastrus thanked this post.

  4. #4

    I'd consider putting a GPS in my kid. Medical records and stuff, no thanks. And I'd rather my family not be among the first generation of testers.
    rosegeranium thanked this post.

  5. #5

    Quote Originally Posted by CaesAug View Post
    Why not?

  6. #6

    if it's not this it will eventually be biometrics, might as well get used to the idea of all of your information being on file with nothing more than a partial fingerprint to go on. Sure it may only be for criminals and high profile people but it will eventually work it's way to general population. I don't see the need for a microchip unless they plan on having it monitor the persons vitals or location. Sure would beat carrying around plastic cards in a wallet though.

  7. #7

    Quote Originally Posted by HannibalLecter View Post
    Why not?
    "Microchips," the woman began, “infringe on issues that are fundamental to our very existence. Our rights to privacy, our rights to bodily integrity, the right to say no to foreign objects being put in our body.”
    amanda32, Lucretius, Swordsman of Mana and 2 others thanked this post.

  8. #8

    As a mandatory procedure, no.
    If someone wants to be chipped, they should be free to.
    android654 thanked this post.

  9. #9

    The company that owns Verichip is, get this: DIGITAL ANGEL.

    The answer IMO is HELL NO. We're not cattle, as much as they would like to make us into that.
    L'Empereur and RobynC thanked this post.

  10. #10

    Quote Originally Posted by LemonSqueeze View Post
    As a mandatory procedure, no.
    If someone wants to be chipped, they should be free to.
    And further, I would not like a society in which we are free to not have microchips in the same way we are free to not have jobs - it should not economically cripple anyone. It should not be mandatory for any job or activity that a typical person would have or do.
    android654 and L'Empereur thanked this post.


Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself. *Note* To protect our forum from spam, we require all users to verify their email. We will send you a confirmation email after you've created an account. Be sure to check your "spam" box if you don't receive it in your inbox.

Select your gender

Choose your Myers Briggs Personality Type. If you are unsure, leave it unknown. You can take the official PerC 16 Type Quiz here.

If you know your Enneagram Type, choose one to show in your profile. You can take the official PerC Enneagram Test here.

If you know your Socionics Type, choose one to show in your profile.

This option will auto start the youtube player..

Your date of birth and age are displayed in several places on the forum. Only the administrator will have access to your date of birth should you choose to hide it via the privacy option below.


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Similar Threads

  1. Are humans animals?
    By Dharma Ga in forum The Debate Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 09-02-2010, 05:54 PM
  2. Humans should not be cloned.
    By HannibalLecter in forum The Debate Forum
    Replies: 81
    Last Post: 05-20-2010, 11:14 AM
  3. Augmented Humans
    By Peaceful Defense in forum Critical Thinking & Philosophy
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-18-2010, 07:32 PM
  4. Replies: 27
    Last Post: 06-04-2009, 08:44 AM
  5. humans right to a fetus
    By slightlybatty in forum The Debate Forum
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 01-05-2009, 08:11 PM

Tags for this Thread


Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:57 PM.
Information provided on the site is meant to complement and not replace any advice or information from a health professional.
© 2014 PersonalityCafe

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0