[Dharma Ga]

This should be interesting

My point of view is that I'm pro-porn, when it is not degrading, as there is unfortunately plenty of that, and also claim to be a feminist of the male gender.

[DayLightSun]

Does the Wicked Jenna Jamson Series count?

[Shai Gar]

Women love porn as much as guys do.

What possible legitimate argument could there be against porn? Besides that it takes away a Woman's prerogative to be a males only source of sexual explosion...

Men get paid almost fuck all unless they're a brilliant actor like The Hedgehog. Women are paid a hell of a lot. Porn is exploitive of men.

[DayLightSun]

Women love porn as much as guys do.

What possible legitimate argument could there be against porn? Besides that it takes away a Woman's prerogative to be a males only source of sexual explosion...

Men get paid almost fuck all unless they're a brilliant actor like The Hedgehog. Women are paid a hell of a lot. Porn is exploitive of men.

I agree with most of this.
The Sniff stuff no good though.

[Shai Gar]

sniff?
or snuff?

[DayLightSun]

sniff?
or snuff?

Snuff I guess? I don't watch it. I saw a fake one once it was to disturbing.

[DayLightSun]

This calls for who's your favorite porn star?
Ramon Numar!

[Shai Gar]

Mark Davis.

Also, I saw some snuff once. It was... Interesting.

[Dharma Ga]

Terri Summers

[snail]

Porn is almost always degrading, but not just to women. It cheapens sex and turns it into something physical instead of something spiritual. It harms marriages by encouraging infidelities of the heart. Even pornography designed to appeal to "feminists" is an attack against the ideal. Viewing pornography causes people to form unrealistic ideas about their bodies and sex, often before they are sexually experienced, and it trains people to feel inappropriately about fornication. By focusing on a physical image in order to become aroused, some people learn to detach sex from love, and instead think of it as something purely related to the senses. The only way it would be acceptable would be if the porn were erotic images of a person's spouse, used only on occasions when the spouse was not available for sex and the partner was at risk for having inappropriately misdirected lustful thoughts without it. Even then, it would only be okay if the person were to use the image as a reminder of the non-physical characteristics of the person represented.

If sex is symbolically equivalent to worship or sacrifice, thinking about partners other than the spouse is symbolic of idolatry, and using images to focus the lust onto a partner other than the spouse is the equivalent of making graven images to false gods. Marriage is supposed to represent the ideal relationship between Christ and the church. Pornography is wrong, not only because of what it causes, but also because of what it represents.