Did I read somewhere that your 4th function is the dominant function of your parent?

Did I read somewhere that your 4th function is the dominant function of your parent?

Hello Guest! Sign up to join the discussion below...
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 54
Thank Tree19Thanks

This is a discussion on Did I read somewhere that your 4th function is the dominant function of your parent? within the Cognitive Functions forums, part of the Personality Type Forums category; or something like that? I remember seeing that somewhere but I don't remember where. Validity?...

  1. #1
    Unknown

    Did I read somewhere that your 4th function is the dominant function of your parent?

    or something like that?
    I remember seeing that somewhere but I don't remember where.




    Validity?
    Eudaimonia and Eudaimonia thanked this post.



  2. #2

    My mother's dominant is my auxiliary...

  3. #3

    I'm convinced right now that my mom's (and possibly also my dad's) dominant is my tertiary. So....yeah.

  4. Remove Advertisements
    PersonalityCafe.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4

    My Mum shares no functions with me.
    nichya thanked this post.

  6. #5
    INFP - The Idealists

    My mothers dominant function is Si (my tert.), my fathers dominant is Ti and I don't have that in my stacking.

  7. #6
    ENTP - The Visionaries

    There are many wild theories on the Internet. Dom-tert loops come to mind. :P
    Figure, Fuzzyslug, Fuzzyslug and 9 others thanked this post.

  8. #7
    INFP

    Then the same types would be grouped together in certain areas. Like with skin colors. The types are randomly distributed, indicating that type isn't directly linked to parents type.

  9. #8
    ESTJ - The Guardians

    My mom's dominant is Te (she's an ENTJ), which happens to be my dominant as an ESTJ, and my dad's dominant is Ti (he's an INTP). So... I'm gonna have to say no.

  10. #9
    Unknown Personality

    Quote Originally Posted by Neverontime View Post
    Then the same types would be grouped together in certain areas. Like with skin colors. The types are randomly distributed, indicating that type isn't directly linked to parents type.
    I'm not saying the theory is correct, it obviously isn't, but who says types aren't grouped together in certain areas?

  11. #10
    INFP

    Quote Originally Posted by Rational Thought View Post
    I'm not saying the theory is correct, it obviously isn't, but who says types aren't grouped together in certain areas?
    I believe Jung and mbti stats both said that they weren't. I haven't traveled around the world to check or anything.


     
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 51
    Last Post: 11-18-2016, 03:14 PM
  2. Trying to understand the 4th Function...
    By YellowDaffodil in forum Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-24-2014, 01:03 AM
  3. Is it possible for your auxiliary function to lead your dominant function?
    By Hal Jordan Prime in forum Myers Briggs Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-02-2013, 08:47 PM
  4. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08-26-2012, 12:29 PM
  5. [INFJ] Se (4th function)
    By Raichan in forum INFJ Forum - The Protectors
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-29-2011, 09:51 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:48 PM.
Information provided on the site is meant to complement and not replace any advice or information from a health professional.
© 2014 PersonalityCafe
 

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0