Unicorntopia

What I Think

Rate this Entry
by , 07-27-2010 at 10:30 AM (1093 Views)
My religion: I consider it a form of Christianity

God=Truth=Love=Everything that ever was, is and will be all at once.

One day God thought to him/herself, wouldn't it be cool to see my Love/Truth/Everything in this cool new way?! Just like the person who invented 3d glasses for the movies thought “wouldn’t it be cool to see movies in a cool new way?!” or like the person who invented the kaleidoscope.

So, he created a separation within him/herself. Just like a prism separates white light into different colors. Since God is infinite there are infinite separations.

And POOF! Universe.

Now that everything is separated from everything else it takes time to get from one thing to another. Time is the reconciliation of cause and effect. When cause and effect are both seen you have Truth. We are now in relation to everything else and can therefore have a relationship with God.

Everything that God has, we have or is available to us. We are subject to the separation (live in it) but have a link to infinity through our subconscious. Our Souls/Wills are located within our subconscious and our conscious is like our hands that we use to operate our brains which are like our computer interface to our bodies and the rest of the world.

Since we have free will we have the choice whether or not we view the Truth. Evil=ignorance; choosing to ignore the Truth/Everything/Love/God. When the Bible says God cast the devil into the earth he means into the separation (out of God, in between). EDIT: (The original sin and what things were like before the sin is explained here by C.S. Lewis from the book The Problem of Pain: "They wanted, as we say, to "call their souls their own." But that means to live a lie, for our souls are not, in fact, our own. They wanted some corner in the universe of which they could say to God, "This is our business, not yours." But there is no such corner... The self surrender which he practised before the Fall meant no struggle but only the delicious overcoming of an infinitesimal self-adherence which delighted to be over-come - of which we see a dim analogy in the rapturous mutual self-surrenders of lovers even now. He had, therefore, no passion or inclination obstinately inclining that way - nothing but the bare fact that the self was himself.")

Jesus is simply God choosing to have the experience of being subject to the separation just like us. It is in a way being blind (limitation). Think of it like a game. We create games that have rules (limitations) and the point is to work to get the goal with having the limitations – tons of fun right? So the point of life is to experience God’s love in this cool new way - working, playing games, going on adventures to see everything, having loving relationships.

Work: being willing to view the Truth and staying with the flow as God flows through the matrix of the separation. This statement is redundant but I wanted to say it to show that the separation begged an expansion that now allows for movement. Everything is constantly flowing in and out of everything else. Example: A human skin cell is always absorbing certain things it comes in contact with and is therefore never exactly the same as what it was a second ago. I am going to call this "flowiness." When one wills to stop the flowiness he scoots toward the inside of the separation as opposed to Everything.(ignoring the truth) Picture the separation being only a thin line you can glide through. This is how I picture it when one is viewing the truth. If one chooses to not view the truth it widens into a gap of emptiness. But, do not think of it as space to stretch in or observe from like outer space. It is a spot of lonely claustrophobia and fear. Example: When someone stays in Ti based on Si and does not venture out into Ne Fe they will end up in a situation like this:

Quote Originally Posted by Mendelevium View Post
When you very much dislike being predictable even in your unpredictability, so you tend to act predictable to be unpredictable to be predictable to be unpredictable and then realize that the your audience is probably able to see through or more likely is unaware of all the double entendres you have buried yourself in, so you shrug mentally and think the dislike of being predictable is fascinating in its emotional premises and go on the research it sometime later after you have ascertained that being predictable is only logical, but how can logic be logical if logic is used to measure the logic of other objects and therefore not itself?

EDIT: However, are the two points mutually exclusive? Has someone else thought of this, and therefore am I being predictable in my ponderings? How is predictability determined, anyhow, and does the degree of accuracy count? Because I can be automatically predicted to be 'myself', or the predetermined mental state I am in possession of, but this is a shortcut, and how can that count?

Or something like that. My thoughts sometimes go in a loop for months on end, with everything ending in the question that had spawned it.
Notice how she broke out of the loop by focusing her attention on emotional possibilities. "the dislike of being predictable is fascinating in its emotional premises and go on the research it"

Everything I am saying here is only my attempt at putting into words what I feel and see, the way I understand, the way I know. It is what I visualize inside my mind as God, the universe and what it means to live in it. I know that I will never be able to put it into words that force the sight/knowledge on another will every time another will reads it.
GloriousEnd314, expodentialfunction and unico thanked this post.

Submit "What I Think" to Digg Submit "What I Think" to StumbleUpon Submit "What I Think" to del.icio.us Submit "What I Think" to Google

Updated 01-15-2011 at 08:42 PM by Unicorntopia (Clarification)

Categories
Uncategorized

Comments

  1. foxglove's Avatar
    Interesting thoughts... I like it.
  2. Unicorntopia's Avatar
    Thanks foxglove, It wasn't until after I came to this realization that I was able to follow and understand C.S. Lewis's book "Problem of Pain." I am on page 40 and I totaly agree with him. He is taking what I know with my intuition and putting into logical words so anyone who can follow logic can understand. I wish to do something of the sort some day but expand upon a more health related topic maybe. Those are still in the making.
  3. SlowPoke68's Avatar
    I like it. Compatible with my own understanding, which was also partially formed by C.S. Lewis.
  4. Psychosmurf's Avatar
    This sounds a lot like the work of Spinoza. You should check it out.
  5. Unicorntopia's Avatar
    I read the Wikipedia of Spinoza. It was very interesting and I agree with much of what he says, but I do believe he has squished himself into an intellectual corner that inhibits him to truly love or be loved. I am most definitely not good and evil relativist.

    One's perception of the universe and the way their feelings feel about it change into something completely different when one is loving and when one is not loving. Pain engulfs when not loving and does not engulf when loving.
    Updated 09-17-2010 at 11:00 AM by Unicorntopia
  6. Nirrith's Avatar
    Maybe we are God... maybe he separated into trillions of consciousnesses to see what would happen if he grew up this way or that, then he (it?) dies and analyses the data when back in "Heaven." Does that go to that "collective unconscious" theory? I'm twisting my mind into sexy pretzels...
  7. Unicorntopia's Avatar
    You got it baby! ;)

    Yes, shortly after I came up with this, a friend from highschool told me he had thought of the same exact thing back in highschool with another friend of ours while they were tripping, but that they had gone further to say that we are all God just like you said.

    I have been pondering that for about a year now and seem to be settling closer and closer to it. I did not go there right off the batt in the beginning because it is very dangerous and pridefull to think that you are God, but the more I think about it, the more I am starting to think that the separation of conscious and unconscious keeps us from being God individually while we are alive and therefore saves us from thinking we are God (like the one and only God). We are only God together. I have also been wondering whether or not the entire universe is an extension of us just like our bodies. So now that has lead me to pondering where our individual wills stop and start - like where and how do they bump into one another and effect one another and which one wins and how is that determined ultimately or is one will winning over another just another illusion of the separation.

    You are so awesome for catching that! :)
  8. Nirrith's Avatar
    Nice, I didn't think anyone else would actually think that, 'cause I guess most people would go "that's blasphemy!" The separation of will that you described is certainly interesting, thanks for the thought-nip.
    Updated 12-08-2010 at 07:34 PM by Nirrith (typo)
  9. Surreal Snake's Avatar
    Seems similar to Spinoza.I like how it is original though.

    We Sail PasT Chagall and Klimt.........................KiSSing.Me

    I believe that truth and love everything.Any thing else rhetoric in a sense.
  10. Unicorntopia's Avatar
    Thank you @Surreal Snake. :)

    Your little one line poem was a nice compliment. It feels very fresh and alive.
  11. unico's Avatar
    I really like your ideas here. I believe in some of the same things. I've read a number of books by C.S. Lewis (including non-fiction), but I still have to read "The Problem of Pain." I have been meaning to read it, though... I agree with a lot of his theology. I don't know if I consider myself a Christian anymore (though I do believe Jesus existed), but I still relate to some Christian ideas.
  12. expodentialfunction's Avatar
    1 john chapter 3
  13. Unicorntopia's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by expodentialfunction
    1 john chapter 3
    Can you explain the connection between 1 john 3 and my blog, please? My brain is being stubborn or I am not sure what you are seeing.
  14. expodentialfunction's Avatar
    Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.
    Unicorntopia thanked this post.
  15. Unicorntopia's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by expodentialfunction
    Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.
    Awsome! :D I like that.
    expodentialfunction thanked this post.
  16. Unicorntopia's Avatar
    Hm... I don't think I think this anymore........... *big cheesing smile*

    I think maybe I am free now. *bigger cheesing smile*
  17. Psychosmurf's Avatar
    ^ Details???
  18. Unicorntopia's Avatar
    .................................
  19. Unicorntopia's Avatar
    Ok I change my mind again. I agree with this again. I just understand it way better now and understand much more. For example, I believe in reincarnation now too. I guess the differnce now is that I don't see it as christianity, I just see it as truth and the basis of most major religions whether or not they admit it. I what is actually wrong is when a religion claims to be different than the next in ways more than mere accessories. Its like they are all outfits of different styles (ex business casual vs workout gear) but they are saying that the other is not an outfit but rather a lie. Its like Christians (at least the way I was raised) are tomatoe soup who think they are the only soup when in reality, there are many kinds of soup which are just as wonderful but in different ways. Its like being racist or typist.
    Psychosmurf thanked this post.
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:14 AM.
Information provided on the site is meant to complement and not replace any advice or information from a health professional.
© PersonalityCafe - All rights reserved.