*disapproves of X site because the content is not reliable*
*yet actively engages and holds serious discussions on a site regarding content based on typology theory, a theory so arbitrary it cannot be said to be reliable.*
This is called pseudo science for a reason, and the fact is all the types and the functions have arbitrary definitions and are applied arbitrarily by whoever is typing. They’re only based on our experience and limited knowledge
Updated 02-05-2017 at 09:03 PM by Gossip Goat
If your reason for avoiding marriage is out of distrust for a group of people because of who they "are", then the problem isn't marriage, the problem is how you relate to other people. Marriage as an institution is defective, but I think that should be the reason to not want to get married and not because women/men are X or women/men do Y. Your problems are biased and that perspective is what probably hinders your relationships.
I don't find it reasonable to blame an entire
Do people look back at things they write and almost find it unbelievable to think they're that person? Not really necessarily in what they wrote. I don't know, partially in how it was written? Or how it feels to read it again? Or do people tend to sometimes feel affectionate towards that person, not all the times? How about dislike?
Updated 01-30-2017 at 01:33 PM by Gossip Goat
People are only careful not to reveal direct answers. I had a question I wanted an answer on, someone knew but didn't feel comfortable telling me. I found the answer later, not directly though. It wasn't like, what is X? X is Y.
More like just “A”, irrespective of the X topic months later, but A-B=Y (B is a fact in time). Y is actually very shocking of an answer, but I won't go into detail why. My guess was off about 10-30 numbers.
A was said a while ago, but only
Updated 01-28-2017 at 08:35 AM by Gossip Goat
Updated 12-25-2016 at 05:37 PM by Gossip Goat