| | |
This is a discussion on When too much becomes too much: Part 2 within the Articles forums, part of the Announcements category; Originally Posted by Calypso Nothing unfortunately, except talk about our mutual disdain for this woman and her poor choices. We ...


Pfft, but it'd be better for the economy than another welfare mum, and better for the children because they'd have a mum who would spend her money on them, rather than 100k on another 8 children.
We don't even know that much about her and you guys are talking a lot of crap. So what if she has 14 kids? We don't even know how they will be raised. Its a little sad to see people judging someone this way when all we know about her is she has 14 kids. You should take your anger out on the father who abandoned his children instead of the woman who gave birth and is willing to take care of them.

I feel sorry for the father, he had to get away from that maniac, It's one of those aggravating things though that he isn't asking for custody of his children though.

You're certainly singing a different tune from the last time I talked about this woman.
She wasn't abandoned, she got divorced. She was in another relationship but did not want to marry the man. She wants to be a single mother. She also has no job. She lives with her parents. It's extremely irresponsible to bring more kids into the world when you already have six. That 100k should have gone towards taking care of her six kids, not having more babies. This woman is an unfit mother and needs to have them all taken away from her.
Humans are not meant to have liters of children, and I hope nobody follows this lady's example, unless they are in a good enough position to support them. But I asked my mother on this and she said the miracle was how they all survived child birth.
I just don't want to see these children go through hardships because their mother didn't think her plan through, or was not thinking of all the possibilities that could go down.
First off, how is that different? I was just surprised she had 14 kids but I never called her names or judged her in anyway. So what if you got divorce? The father must still have rights to seeing his children. Why not let her live her life and see what happens to the children? Obviously if she can't take it, we would know since she is very famous. I mean if she can afford the 100k, than she might have enough money to raise her children.
She's not famous, she's the subject of media just because of all the controversy she has caused. She saved the 100k when she still had a job. She's not able to work now because of an injury she suffered at her job and her disability has run out. She has no source of income at all right now other then the food stamps. Is it really fair for her children to have to live this way? No, no it's not.
Thing is we do not know anything about the woman. We are judging her based on what the media says. The media is known to take parts of interviews, and exaggerating them to the full extreme. I say let us see how she will raise the children. I would not want people talking crap about my mother, would you?
Bookmarks