Michelangelo or Da Vinci?


Hello Guest! Sign up to join the discussion below...
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
Thank Tree6Thanks

This is a discussion on Michelangelo or Da Vinci? within the The Art Museum forums, part of the Topics of Interest category; in my personal opinion michelangelo is a better artist and has a more . . . passionate form of art ...

  1. #1

    Michelangelo or Da Vinci?

    in my personal opinion michelangelo is a better artist and has a more . . . passionate form of art that da vinci uses but i want to hear your opinions who do you think is better? why?

  2. #2

    I totally agree. Leonardo was interested in so many things that I think it was more important to him to explore them and learn, while Michelangelo was much more interested in painting and sculpture for his own expression. If I had to guess I would think that Leonardo was and NP of some sort, and Michelangelo was an SP of some sort.
    .
    Kayness thanked this post.

  3. #3

    I almost cried when I saw Michaelangelo's Pietà. That's why he is my favourite of the two.

    I feel like he wants to express, while Da Vinci wants to show.

  4. #4

    Michelangelo couldn't paint/sculpt women.



    Look at those fake boobs! Lol.

    Well actually, he may have done it intentionally. Maybe.

    I prefer Da Vinci. Both of these guys leave me pretty cold when it comes to emotion effect but I like Leonardo's aesthetics more.
    Attached Images
    adverseaffects and Kayness thanked this post.

  5. #5

    I prefer Da Vinci. But MA was also good.
    Abx and koalaroo thanked this post.

  6. #6

    Probably Michelangelo, especially his work in the Sistine Chapel, which I find to be mind bogglingly breathtaking. I feel even more admiration for it because apparently he saw himself more as a sculptor than a painter. But I love the scientific nature of some of Leonardo's work.

  7. #7

    Michaelangelo is a big nothing compared to Da Vinci. Da Vinci was the most diversely talented man EVER
    koalaroo thanked this post.

  8. #8

    Michelangelo worked pretty hard with his artworks. I've learned in art history he even wore a candle to his headpiece when he worked with his statues late at night. Leonardo of Vinci, during that time, slacked a bit in his workshop--he only applies to his project with comfort (food, music and such). However, it doesn't subtract the fact that he's talented..not a lot of people can create sfumato in their paintings! Lol, he doesn't finish most of his projects.

    Therefore, I can't decide between the two. I like Michelangelo's on-point of portraying feelings with his sculptural works, and I appreciate the experimental processes Leonardo had played around with.

    If you're a patron in need of spiritual works, then Michelangelo would be the guy for you, plus he will get things done. If you're a philosopher in need for discussing new ideas and inventions, then there's Leonardo.

  9. #9

    Michelangelo. I just look at the Pieta and my heart wants to burst.

    @notfunny
    I never saw that sculpture before though... guess Michelangelo was really male-centric in his art.. that looks like a man with tumors on his chest.

  10. #10

    Da Vinci for me. I just find his work so breathtakingly beautiful.


 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. The Vinci Art
    By vanWinchester in forum The Art Museum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-21-2009, 02:06 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:42 AM.
Information provided on the site is meant to complement and not replace any advice or information from a health professional.
© PersonalityCafe - All rights reserved.